Free Sticker: “VOTE THEM OUT!” – Moveon.org

The last few weeks of Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate have thrown into sharp relief just how corrupt Trump is—and how far Republicans will go to protect him from any consequences for his criminality.

But we won’t forget their complicity in Trump’s crimes. We won’t forget their sham proceeding with no witnesses and no documents. And in November, we’ll make sure that they pay for it at the ballot box.

To help spread this message far and wide, MoveOn has just printed a big batch of “Vote Them Out” stickers, and we’re giving them away for free, while supplies last.

Just click here or on the image below to order your sticker now.

We don’t yet know exactly what Trump will say tonight during the State of the Union, but if he follows his old patterns, he will certainly use this national air time to promote conspiracy theories, demonize immigrant and refugee communities, lie about his record, and work to demoralize Democrats and progressives while rallying his base. And he may brag about his impending “total exoneration.”

But if his goal is to stamp down our energy, he has already failed. We are outraged, and we are turning that outrage into action.

For the next nine months, MoveOn members and our allies will flex our muscles and build an unstoppable grassroots movement to defeat Republicans up and down the ballot, and elect Democrats to the White House, Senate, and House of Representatives.

Will you help us spread the message, Robert? Click here to order your free “Vote Them Out” sticker now.

Thanks for all you do.

–Kelly, Oscar, Tzyh, David, and the rest of the team

Trump ally Roger Stone guilty of lying to Congress

A US jury also convicts the former Trump adviser of obstruction and witness tampering.

Roger Stone, longtime political ally of US President Donald Trump, arrives for his arraignment at US District Court in Washington, DC [File: Leah Millis/Reuters]
Roger Stone, longtime political ally of US President Donald Trump, arrives for his arraignment at US District Court in Washington, DC

United States jury convicted President Donald Trump‘s former adviser Roger Stone on Friday, finding the longtime Republican operative and self-proclaimed “dirty trickster” guilty on seven criminal counts of lying to Congress, obstruction and witness tampering.

The verdict, in a trial arising from investigations of Russian interference in the 2016 US election, is not only a blow to Stone but renews scrutiny on then-candidate Trump’s activities at a time when he faces an impeachment inquiry that could derail his presidency.

The 67-year-old veteran Republican political operative – a self-described “agent provocateur” – was charged earlier this year with obstructing justice, witness tampering and lying to the US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee during its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump almost immediately reacted to the news, tweeting: “So they now convict Roger Stone of lying and want to jail him for many years to come. Well, what about Crooked Hillary, Comey, Strzok, Page, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Shifty Schiff, Ohr & Nellie, Steele & all of the others, including even Mueller himself?”

He added: “A double standard like never seen before in the history of our Country?”

Colourful trial

Stone’s colourful trial in federal court in Washington, DC, was as much about the rough-and-tumble world of politics, as it was about hair-splitting legal arguments, such as whether Stone truly lied about WikiLeaks since that website was never explicitly mentioned in the intelligence committee’s publicly-stated parameters of its investigation.

The trial featured testimony by political heavyweights including former Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon and former Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates, each of whom said they believed Stone had inside information about when WikiLeaks might release more damaging emails about then-Republican candidate Trump’s Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.

Roger Stone
Roger Stone, former adviser to President Donald Trump, and his wife Nydia Stone arrive at the court [Mark Wilson/Getty Images/AFP]

Prosecutors accused Stone of telling politicians five different lies related to WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, which in 2016 dumped a series of damaging emails about Clinton that US intelligence officials and then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller later concluded had been stolen by Russian hackers.

Some of those lies relate to the existence of certain texts or emails, while others pertain to Stone’s conversations with Trump campaign officials and a supposed “intermediary” with WikiLeaks in early August 2016 whom Stone identified to politicians as being comedian Randy Credico.

Prosecutors said Stone did not actually start talking to Credico about WikiLeaks until later that month, and the actual person to whom he was referring in testimony as an “intermediary” was conservative author Jerome Corsi whom Stone dispatched in an email to “Get to Assange!” and get the emails.

Corsi was not called as a witness in the trial.

Trump ally Roger Stone charged with lying in Russia investigation

Stone, a close Trump ally who famously has the face of former president Richard Nixon tattooed on his back, was also accused of tampering with a witness, Credico, when Credico was summoned to testify before Congress and speak with the FBI.

Stone and Credico, who took the stand in the case, have since said that Credico did not act as a WikiLeaks backchannel.

In emails and texts, the jury saw messages that Stone had sent Credico that included comments like “Prepare to die”, “You’re a rat. A stoolie”, and “Stonewall it. Plead the Fifth. Anything to save the plan”, in a reference to a famous Nixon Watergate quote.

He also repeatedly urged Credico to “do a Frank Pentangeli” – a reference to a “Godfather II” character who recants his congressional testimony against a mobster amid intimidation.

A lawyer for Stone dismissed the Pentangeli reference, saying Credico had done impressions of the character in the past, and said the “odious language” they used was just part of how they interacted.

A federal judge scheduled Stone’s sentenced for February 2020.

‘Fake’: Thousands rally in US against Trump’s national emergency

More than 250 rallies held across the US to decry Trump’s national emergency declaration to build the border wall.

People gather to protest against Trump's declaration of a national emergency at Trump International Hotel & Tower in Manhattan [Andrew Kelly/Reuters]
People gather to protest against Trump’s declaration of a national emergency at Trump International Hotel & Tower in Manhattan [Andrew Kelly/Reuters]

Washington, DC – Thousands of people rallied nationwide on Monday to protest against the national emergency US President Donald Trump declared last week to help fund his long-promised wall across the US-Mexico border.

More than 250 rallies were organised across the United States on President’s Day, a US government holiday, with protesters carrying banners and placards that called the national emergency “fake”.

“I do think we have a national emergency in this country, this is an emergency to our democratic system,” Angelina Huynh, who joined the rally in Washington, DC, outside the White House with her two preschool children, told Al Jazeera.

As the snow fell in Boston, Massachusetts, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley took to the stage to speak against Trump’s bid to bypass Congress and help free up $8bn in funds for his wall, which was one of his biggest 2016 campaign promises.

Protesters and civil rights organisations called on Congress to take action against Trump’s latest move.

“Thank you other cities & states filing lawsuits! No better way to spend Presidents’ Day than rallying to stop this crazy President [with] his fake emergency to build a wall!” tweeted Congresswoman Maxine Waters before a rally in Los Angeles, California.

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Daniel Altschuler@altochulo

“Come for one, face us ALL!”

Immigrants, Muslim, Black and LGBTQ folks, and white allies standing united outside the White House and Trump’s .

Our solidarity is .

Trump declared the national emergency after Democrats refused to cave in to his demand of more than $5bn in funding for the wall. That demand led to the longest government shutdown of its kind late last year and into 2019.

The shutdown ended in late January when Trump, his fellow Republicans and Democrats agreed to temporarily fund the government while talks on border security continued.

Racing against the clock, Democratic and Republican negotiators came to an agreement last week to keep the government open. The deal did not include funds for Trump’s wall but did include about $1.37bn in funding for physical barriers.

Trump agreed to sign the legislation, but also announced he was declaring a national emergency over the border, drawing immediate challenges from Democrats and rights groups.

The president maintains that a wall is needed to stem irregular immigration and the flow of illicit drugs into the country. But statistics show that irregular immigration has been on the decline for decades and most illegal drugs enter the US through official ports of entry.

Angelina Huynh joins a rally in Washington, DC, against Trump’s national emergency deceleration with her two children on February 18, 2019. [Ola Salem/Al Jazeera]

‘How many people are angry?’

Activists and civil rights organisations were joined at rallies on Monday by those affected by Trump’s policies over the past two years since he took office, including those affected by the ban on travellers from several Muslim-majority countries, the crackdown on undocumented immigration and child separations at the border.

“I have a question, how many people are angry?” a speaker called out to hundreds of protesters at noon in Lafayette Park in the US capital. “How many people are sick and tired of being sick and tired?” the crowd was asked as they cheered in response.

Jo Hannah from Texas visited the border in 2017 and said she saw no emergency. Instead, she saw a plan that would devastate wildlife in the area and a plan that could tear down a wildlife centre in San Antonio.

“Around 10,000 monarch butterflies breed in this centre every year, and they are going to tear this centre for the wall,” she said to Al Jazeera from the Washington, DC rally.

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

Deborah Rosenman@drosenman

Check out all the people at the against the and his racist agenda. Congress must act now! @MoveOn

Legal challenges

Since Trump’s announcement on Friday, several Democrats said they would challenge the declaration that would help Trump override Congress’ purse power.

Cheers erupted outside the White House as a member of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) told a crowd that the civil rights group was preparing to sue Trump for declaring a national emergency.

So far, three Texas landowners and an environmental group have filed the first lawsuit challenging Trump, the nonprofit watchdog group Public Citizen said.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra told local media that he planned to file a suit as well. In an interview, he said the suit was “definitely and imminently” coming.

New Mexico, Oregon, Minnesota, New Jersey, Hawaii and Connecticut are among several states joining the lawsuit, local media reported, quoting the attorney general’s office.

Protesters outside the White House rally against Trump’s national emergency deceleration on February 18, 2019. [Ola Salem/Al Jazeera]

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA NEWS

Trump inauguration team ordered to turn over documents

Trump waves during his inaugurationImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES

Prosecutors in Manhattan have ordered the Trump inaugural committee to hand over documents relating to how the team raised and spent over $100m (£77m).

The subpoena requests a wide range of data regarding who donated to the inauguration, whether they were non-US citizens, and how the money was spent.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders told CNN on Tuesday that the order has “nothing to do with the president”.

The subpoena, which has not been made public, does not allege any wrongdoing.

“We have just received a subpoena for documents,” a spokeswoman for the Trump inaugural committee told US media.

“While we are still reviewing the subpoena, it is our intention to co-operate with the inquiry.”

According to federal election law, foreign nationals are prohibited from donating to a US inaugural committee.

Inauguration chairman Tom Barrack Jr greets Mike Pence before Mr Trump's swearing-in ceremonyInauguration chairman Tom Barrack Jr greets Mike Pence before Mr Trump’s swearing-in ceremony

The investigation is separate from special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of possible Trump campaign ties to Russia, an investigation that has led to several indictments and guilty pleas.

The subpoena from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office comes grew out of the campaign finance prosecution of Michael Cohen, President Trump’s ex-personal lawyer.

The investigation into Cohen, who is due to begin a prison sentence next month after implicating Mr Trump, arose from a referral from Mr Mueller’s team to New York prosecutors.

According to ABC News, prosecutors are also requesting information about who attended inaugural events as Mr Trump was sworn into office in January 2017 and whether they were promised photo-ops with the president-elect, ABC News reports.

Tom Barrack Jr, a real-estate developer and close friend of the president who served as chairman of the inaugural committee, is not named in the documents.

The only man named is Imaad Zuberi, a former fundraiser for Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton whose company gave $900,000 to the committee.

Has Trump kept his promises?

A spokesman for Mr Zuberi said he had given “generously and directly” to the inaugural committee, but added that many others donated “substantially more”.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Mr Zuberi had several conversations with Cohen about access to inaugural events.

In 2014, Mr Zuberi registered as a lobbyist for Sri Lanka.

On influencing events in Venezuela Canada needs a history lesson

Let’s remember the time when Charles de Gaulle meddled in our affairs, the way we today meddle in Venezuela‘s.

Former French President Charles de Gaulle raises his arms with fists closed as he speaks from the balcony of Montreal City Hall, Quebec on July 25, 1967 [File: AP photo]
Former French President Charles de Gaulle raises his arms with fists closed as he speaks from the balcony of Montreal City Hall, Quebec on July 25, 1967 [File: AP photo]

Apparently, Canada’s prime minister and foreign minister require a short, instructive history lesson in light of their fulsome, almost giddy, support for the attempted coup d’etat unfolding in Venezuela.

It’s not at all surprising that Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland have conveniently forgotten when, several decades ago, top Canadian politicians – including Trudeau’s late father, Pierre – were livid after a foreign head of state stuck his big, signature nose into Canada’s tricky, delicate business, as they go about sticking their pretty, petite noses into Venezuela‘s tricky, delicate business.

This amnesia is, of course, de rigueur among Western political dilettantes whose diplomatic modus operandi still reflects a grating, colonial-like attitude that dictates to “developing” countries – there’s one set of international rules for us, and quite another set for you. So, take heed, rather than suffer the potentially brutish consequences.      

While Venezuela and its fractured people rest dangerously on the precipice, Trudeau and Freeland – a pair of so-called liberals – have elected to stand literally shoulder-to-shoulderwith renowned “populists” like Donald Trump and Brazil’s new president, Jair Bolsonaro, as they prop up their youthful marionette, Juan Guaido, as the country’s “interim” president.

Now, while it’s plain that scores of Venezuelans back Guaido, millions more want the imperious Yankees and Canucks to pack up their sanctimonious lectures about liberty, democracy and human rights and go home.

Watching Trudeau and Freeland scoff at the right of Venezuelans to determine the political destiny of their own country without the familiar “regime change” subterfuge and rhetoric oozing from Washington, DC and Ottawa, I was reminded of another indelible scene when an apoplectic Canada declared former French president, Charles de Gaulle, in effect, persona non grata for attempting to split the fragile country in two.  

In 1967, the towering de Gaulle, with his equally prominent nose, visited Canada during the 1967 International and Universal Exposition. At the time, the long-simmering Quebec separatist movement was gathering momentum and de Gaulle, it seems, was anxious to give it a titanic push.

On the eve of the visit, Canada’s then prime minister, Lester B Pearson, was so concerned that de Gaulle would exploit his stay to champion the separatist cause and, in doing so, intervene in Canada’s combustible politics, he dispatched his foreign minister to meet the French president in Paris to mend bilateral relations.

The diplomatic overture failed spectacularly. On July 24 that year de Gaulle stood defiantly on a balcony at Montreal’s city hall before an adoring throng of Quebecers. In his speech, de Gaulle did precisely what Pearson didn’t want him to do – step firmly and loudly into Canada’s internal affairs.

Privately, de Gaulle told his son-in-law, General Alain de Boissieu, that he planned to“strike a strong blow. Things are going to get hot. But it is necessary.” Things got “hot” all right. As de Gaulle’s address – broadcast live on radio – built to a climactic crescendo as he leaned into the microphone and, in his unmistakable baritone, bellowed: “Vive le Quebec. Vive le Quebec libre. Vive le Canada Francais! Vive la France!”

De Gaulle lingered on “libre” as if he were hurling a grenade into Canada’s already frail political psyche. The crowd exploded (in delight) and so did Canada-France relations.

Angry English-speaking Canadians deluged the liberal government with messages demanding de Gaulle be booted immediately from the country. Pearson demurred, choosing instead to issue a blistering statement slamming the meddling French leader.

“The statement by the president … [is] unacceptable,” a fuming Pearson told Canadians. “The people of Canada are free. Every province in Canada is free. Canadians do not need to be liberated … Canada will remain united and will reject any effort to destroy her unity.”

Then Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau also weighed in, wondering, justifiably, what the French reaction would have been if a Canadian prime minister shouted, “Brittany to the Bretons”.

Days later, an unapologetic de Gaulle went back to France, leaving behind a ruptured country now dealing with an invigorated separatist movement in Quebec intent on seceding from Canada. The damage was done.

Rather than learn from the lessons of the not-so-distant past when Canada became indignant at an influential outsider butting into its affairs, Trudeau and Freeland have parroted de Gaulle – an unrepentant provocateur Trudeau Sr once rebuked.

The hypocrisy is as galling as it is telling.

Reportedly, Freeland has been repeatedly in touch with the opposition upstart in the weeks and even hours before his carefully orchestrated gambit to wrest the presidency of Venezuela from Nicolas Maduro.

Freeland played a “key role” in “secret talks” with Guiado from mid-December up to his “swearing-in” ceremony on January 23.

On cue, Freeland released a statement instantly recognizing Guiado as interim president. “Canadians stand with the people of Venezuela and their desire to restore constitutional democracy and human rights in Venezuela,” Freeland said.

Countless Venezuelans, I suspect, will bristle at Freeland’s implicit suggestion that they need to be liberated and reject her explicit attempt to trespass on their future.

I also imagine that Pearson and Trudeau Sr would, at the very least, be chagrined by Freeland’s and Trudeau Jr’s naked interference. But interfere they have on a continent where previous US chicanery has left such a lasting, disastrous and painful residue.

And that, no doubt, will be the defining epitaph of Canada’s complaisant foreign minister and its dauphin prime minister – two “liberals” masquerading as “progressives” linking arms with Donald Trump and his fawning Brazilian acolyte to depose a socialist president in South America.

It’s a truism that Canada is a client state of its southern neighbour. But Brazil too? Who knew?

O Canada, indeed.

Germany to Shut Down All Coal Plants by 2038

JAN 28, 2019

H9 germany to end coal use

Germany will move to shut down all of its coal-fired power plants by 2038 as part of the country’s commitment to renewable energy. The move was announced by a government-appointed commission, which is proposing $45 billion to assist regions most affected by the closure of the coal plants. Germany is also on track to close down all of its nuclear power plants by 2022. Renewables made up over 40 percent of the energy supplied in Germany last year, surpassing coal for the very first time.

trumpcoal

Women’s March 2019: Thousands across the US march for third year!

Women and supporters across the US march against Trump amid government shutdown and controversy within the movement.

Washington, DC – Sherry Cain, a 78-year-old Kentucky native, said she’s lived a long time and has seen a lot of change in the world, “but never anything like this in our country”.

That’s why she brought her family to Washington, DC on Saturday for the third annual Women’s March.

“I am just so fearful for their future if continue on this road,” she told Al Jazeera, pointing to the government shutdown, US President Donald Trump’s immigration policies and what she called the “abdication of Congress of their duties”.

“We have to do something,” she said.

Four generations of the Cain family – Sherry, her daughter, granddaughter and great grandson – joined thousands of women and their supporters who marched nationwide.

This year’s march came against the backdrop of a partial government shutdown, now in its 29th day, that started after Trump refused to back down on his demand for more than $5bn in funding for a wall on the US southern border.

The forecast of rain and snow in Washington, DC, on Saturday, combined with the National Park Service limited snow removal services due to the shutdown prompted DC organisers to change the route of the march, according to local media. Participants started at Freedom Plaza, a few blocks from the White House, instead of the National Mall, as initially planned.

Sherry Cain brought her daughters, granddaughter and great-grandson to the march [Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath/Al Jazeera]

Protesters marched past the Trump International Hotel chanting, “All for one and one for all, stop the shutdown, stop the wall.”

At one point, a woman released a Trump baby balloon into the air and the crowd started waving, cheering and yelling, “good-bye!”

New US Congress makes history with record number of women

Some held signs that called for Trump to be impeached, others emphasised the need to believe survivors of sexual assault and rape, and many demanded an end to the shutdown.

Raquel Chee held a sign that read, “See me. I am still here.”

“We are here to tell everybody …that we’re not going anywhere,” said Chee, a member of the Window Rock Navajo Nation in Arizona.

She told Al Jazeera she brought her four children with her to the march to give a voice to her brother, uncles and and murdered or missing indigenous people across North America.

“We are here to speak out for them, remember them and bring light on the issue that our relatives go missing and murdered all the time,” she said.

Raquel Chee said she’s march for all the indigenous people who have been murdered or gone missing [Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath/Al Jazeera]

Historic gains

The Women’s March movement began after the 2016 election of Trump. The day after his inauguration in January 2017, millions worldwide marched for women’s rights.

According to organisers, this year’s march focused on the success of the 2018 midterm elections, which saw a record number of women run and get elected to office. The first Muslim women, Native American women, and youngest woman were recently sworn into Congress.

The movement also hopes to turn its attention to the presidential race in 2020.

Thousands marched past the Trump International Hotel in Washington, DC, chanting ‘stop the shutdown, stop the wall’ [Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath/Al Jazeera]

In major cities, however, participants held separate marches due to controversy within the Women’s March movement.

In November, Teresa Shook, one of the Women’s March co-founders, accused other organisers of steering “the Movement away from its true course”, referring to allegations of anti-Semitic ties directed at Linda Sarsour, who criticises the US’s policy towards Israel, and Tamika Mallory, who maintains an association with Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the Nation of Islam.

READ MORE

US Women’s March: Controversy around co-president

In a Facebook post, Shook called on Sarsour, Mallory, Bob Bland and Carmen Perez to step down and “to let others lead who can restore the faith in the Movement and its original intent”.

The four organisers denied the allegations, but Sarsour said in a statement that the movement “should have been faster and clearer in helping people understand our values and our commitment to fighting anti-Semitism”.

Since then several local marches and activists have sought to distance themselves from the national movement.

Despite the controversy, thousands of women showed up to marches on Saturday.

This year’s march came after a year of historic gains for women in politics in the US [Laurin-Whitney Gottbrath/Al Jazeera]

Although the number is far less than the first march in 2017, 19-year-old Howard University student Ciana Moore said it’s still important to continue standing up for everyone has been affected by Trump’s presidency.

“It’s amazing to see all different types of women, all ages, people from all over coming together,” she told Al Jazeera as the Washington, DC march was just getting under way.

“It’s really empowering to be here for each other.”

SOURCE: by / AL JAZEERA NEWS

Maine: Woman’s March 2019

Marchers in Maine marched in Portland, Bethel, Eastport, Machias, and Brunswick.

PORTLAND, Maine — The 2019 Women’s March Maine brought thousands of people together in solidarity to advocate for women all over the state.

Marchers in Maine marched in Portland, Bethel, Eastport, Machias, and Brunswick.

In Portland there were hundreds lining Congress, High, and Pearl streets.

Women's March Maine 2019

Spokesperson for the Women’s March Maine Sarah Gaba says, “We’ve been organizing locally to advocate for the policies that matter to us, and impact women’s lives, and we’re flooding the streets in solidarity with our sisters in DC to remind the country that Maine resists”.

Author: Lydia Libby, Newscenter Maine